Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State of Iowa v. Anthony Allen Hoeck

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 14, 2014No. 11–1228Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMansfield, Justice

I agree that the sentence as corrected by the district court should be affirmed. However, I would not make the affirmance conditional.

Let’s recap what is before this court. In 1994, Hoeck was convicted of first-degree kidnapping, second-degree murder, first-degree robbery, criminal gang participation, conspiracy, and a weapons offense for his leading role in the brutal assault, abduction, and murder of a seventeen-year-old girl. See State v. Hoeck, 547 N.W.2d 852, 855-56 (Iowa Ct.App.1996). Pursuant to Iowa law, Hoeck received a mandatory life-without-parole sentence on the first-degree…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. State v. BrueggerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  4. State of Iowa v. Denem Anthony NullSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  5. Diatchenko v. District Attorney for the Suffolk DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API