Legal Opinion

Holland America Insurance v. National Indemnity Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1969No. 39438PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

This case presents for decision a single question of law—whether an insurer which has issued a policy of automobile liability insurance is obliged to defend a person who is not the named insured but is allegedly an insured under the omnibus clause. The omnibus clause in the policy with which we are concerned, which was a standard policy of its type, provided that the word “insured” included any person using the automobile with the permission of the named insured.

The automobile described in the policy was involved in an accident, arid an action wás' brought against the named insured and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp. v. Southern General Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Smith v. Insurance Co. of State of PennsylvaniaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Town of Tieton v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Western Pac. Ins. Co. v. Farmers Ins. ExchangeWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Lawrence v. Northwest Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Truck Ins. Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Truck Insurance Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API