Legal Opinion
Cappa v. Wiseman
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 21, 1979No. C-76-624 WHOPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORRICK, District Judge.
Whether an employer and a union, in applying the terms of an industry-wide collective bargaining agreement to the employer’s workplace, may orally agree to limit the scope of the bargaining unit to which the agreement shall apply is the question presented by defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons hereinafter stated, the Court concludes that such an agreement is proper, and finding, based upon the pleadings, depositions and affidavits, that there exists no genuine issue as to any material fact, grants defendants’ motion.
Defendant Warehouse Union…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, a Corporation v. Communications Workers of America, an Unincorporated AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Max Manning, Trustee for and on Behalf of Painters and Associated Trades Trust Fund v. Ron Wiscombe, Dba Ron Wiscombe Painting and SandblastingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Lewis v. LowryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Warrior Constructors, Inc. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 926, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cappa v. WisemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Mohr v. Metro East Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Behnke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Central States, Southeast And Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Behnke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Pace v. Honolulu Disposal Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.