Eisenman Seed Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles
This appeal is taken from a judgment for plaintiff entered by the district court of the first judicial district, Lewis and Clark County, and the court’s subsequent denial of defendant’s ■exceptions to the findings of fact and conclusions of law and its motion to amend such findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The principal issue involved is whether defendant is liable to plaintiff for loss of grain occurring after defendant delivered the shipment to the - consignee.
Plaintiff, Eisenman Seed Company (hereinafter referred to as Eisenman), commenced this action in the district court seeking to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. NothnagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Secretary of Agriculture v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Republic Arloading and Distributing Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Jos. Toker Co., Inc. v. Lehigh Valley RR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Miller v. Fallon CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1986
- Miller v. Fallon CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1986
- Miller v. Fallon CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1986
- State Ex Rel Sammons Trucking v. BoMontana Supreme Court · 1976
- State ex rel. Sammons Trucking, Inc. v. BollingerMontana Supreme Court · 1976