Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Reis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1999No. 99-836PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent engaged in a pattern of neglect and deceit, failed to return her clients’ property and funds upon request, and failed to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigations. In addition, we have previously indefinitely suspended respondent from the practice of law due to a comparable pattern of client neglect. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Reis (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 124, 684 N.E.2d 1214. Absent any mitigating circumstances, respondent’s pattern of misconduct and appropriation of client funds and property warrant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. WolosinOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. ReisOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. ReisOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API