Legal Opinion

Smith v. Gross, Shuman, Brizdle & Gilfillan, P. C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The record establishes that the minimum subscription of 7,000 shares of preferred stock of Triad Manufacturing Group, Inc. (Triad), was met, which triggered defendants’ obligation as escrow agent to release the funds (see, Farago v Burke, 262 NY 229, 233; Matter of Kaplan v Shaffer, 112 AD2d 369, 370). The fact that one of the checks may have bounced or was not immediately deposited by Triad has no bearing on the issue whether…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farago v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Stoddard v. . LumNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Kaplan v. ShafferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Allen v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  5. Allen v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Triad Manufacturing Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API