Legal Opinion

People v. Darrell P.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 1981No. Civ. 20131PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REYNOSO, J.

We must decide a procedural issue of juvenile law based on our interpretation of a recent decision by our Supreme Court, In re Winnetka V. (1980) 28 Cal.3d 587 [169 Cal.Rptr. 713, 620 P.2d 163]. Is due process violated when a superior court, sitting as a juvenile court, exercises its statutory authority to order a rehearing, without first obtaining and reviewing a transcript of the testimony heard by the referee? Under the facts of this case, which we relate below, we conclude that the -procedure used is constitutionally permissible.

Darrell P. appeals from an order of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. Edgar M.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Davis v. Damon C.California Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re Drexel F.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. People v. Jonathan S.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. People v. James R.California Court of Appeal · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sacramento County Department of Health & Human Services v. Leslie B.California Court of Appeal · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API