People v. Darrell P.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
We must decide a procedural issue of juvenile law based on our interpretation of a recent decision by our Supreme Court, In re Winnetka V. (1980) 28 Cal.3d 587 [169 Cal.Rptr. 713, 620 P.2d 163]. Is due process violated when a superior court, sitting as a juvenile court, exercises its statutory authority to order a rehearing, without first obtaining and reviewing a transcript of the testimony heard by the referee? Under the facts of this case, which we relate below, we conclude that the -procedure used is constitutionally permissible.
Darrell P. appeals from an order of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kirkpatrick v. Edgar M.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Davis v. Damon C.California Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Drexel F.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. Jonathan S.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. James R.California Court of Appeal · 1978
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sacramento County Department of Health & Human Services v. Leslie B.California Court of Appeal · 2007