State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. North Carolina Consumers Council, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Intervenor’s exceptions and assignments of error bring forward only one question for decision and that is whether the Commission has lawful authority to adopt a rule providing that utilities subject to its jurisdiction may charge no more than 1% per month to their customers in North Carolina as a late payment charge on amounts owing 25 days or longer after the rendering of the bill.
Intervenor argues that the 1% per month permissible charge amounts to interest; that the Utilities Commission has no authority to set interest rates, a matter for the General Assembly, and that even…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coffelt v. Arkansas Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Arkansas Natural Gas Co. v. Norton Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- City of Dearborn v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. Kansas Gas and Electric Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Ferguson v. Electric Power Board of Chattanooga, Tenn.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Ashcroft v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Guste v. Council of City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Massachusetts Electric Co. v. Doctors Hospital of Worcester, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.