Rogers v. State

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for the offense of burglary; punishment, enhanced under Article 63, V.A.P.C., life.

Appellant brings six grounds of error herein. The first is his contention that a motion to quash the indictment should have been granted because he was denied an examining trial.

The failure to grant an examining trial prior to the return of - an indictment does not affect the validity of the indictment. The return of an indictment terminates the right to an examining trial and eliminates the necessity therefor. See, e. g., Tex.Cr.App., Solomon v. State, 467…