Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Fantino

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPette, J.

In this action to determine a claim to real property pursuant to article 15 of the Real Property Law, plaintiff moves to strike out the defense under rules 109 and 110 of the Rules of Civil Practice and for judgment on the pleadings under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice and section 476 of the Civil Practice Act.

Before turning to the facts it may be well to state that plaintiff’s motion under rule 110 must be denied since that rule may be invoked only when the answer contains a counterclaim. (Bomar v. Pasinsky, 254 App. Div. 322.)

The facts are as follows: The defendant Charles…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lefler v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. Lowe v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Lowe v. SheldonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. Gillespie v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Bomar v. PasinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. FantinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API