Bourgeois v. Jung

This is a suit by Charles A. Bourgeois, a real estate agent, against his principal for $739.99, the balance alleged to be due him as a commission under a contract whereby he undertook to procure for his employer a tenant of certain real estate belonging to his principal under a ten year lease. The defendant, Arthur L. Jung, though admitting the employment of plaintiff and the procurement of the tenant for his property, denies owing him any sum whatever because of the alleged failure of consideration of the contract of employment.

There was judgment below in plaintiff's favor as prayed for and…