Legal Opinion

Robertson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 24, 1968No. 41231PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DICE, Judge.

The offense is robbery by assault, with a prior conviction for assault with intent to murder, alleged for enhancement. Upon a bifurcated trial, the punishment was assessed by the trial judge at life imprisonment, under the provisions of Art. 62, P.C.

Appellant’s sole ground of error is that the court erred in failing to quash the indictment for the reason that enhancement of the punishment was unauthorized under Art. 62, supra, because robbery by assault and assault with intent to murder are not offenses of like character as contemplated by the statute.

Art. 62, supra, reads:

“…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Warner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  4. Harbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Harbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MurchisonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Flanagan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Flanagan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API