Legal Opinion

Milliorn v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 9, 1942No. 22294PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment on a forfeited bail bond.

No necessity exists to state the case at any length. It is sufficient to say that the bail bond, the forfeiture of which formed the basis of the judgment, was dated “this---day of February, A. D. 194.1.” It showed to have been “taken and approved” by the sheriff on “the 11th day of Feb. A. D. 1941.”

The scire facias, which forms not only the State’s pleading in a bond forfeiture case but also the citation to the sureties, described the bond as having been dated the “11th day of February, A. D. 1941, — — —.” There…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mills v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. O'Clarke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API