Legal Opinion

Vilhac v. Biven

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1865PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fifth Judicial District, San Joaquin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Currey, J.

This action was brought to recover the amount due on a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage of certain real property executed by the .defendants to secure the payment of the note. The note, a copy of which is set forth in the complaint, bears date the 5th of October, 1863, and is made payable six months after date, with interest at one and a half per cent per month, in current gold coin of the United States. The mortgage was executed on the day of the date of the note and was duly recorded on that day. The action was commenced on the 18th of July, 1864. On the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hutton v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sharp v. LumleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Caldwell v. GreelyNevada Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Hendrick v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Quivey v. GambertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API