Legal Opinion

Hall v. Staha

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 27, 1993No. 92-338PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James R. Van Dover, Special Justice.

This is the second appeal of two consolidated actions of which a shareholders derivative action, filed by appellants under Rule 23.1, ARCP, remains.

Appellants, led by Dr. Billy Hall, are minority shareholders of Dunhall Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Dunhall”), a privately traded Arkansas corporation. Dr. Hall is one of Dunhall’s organizers and the only member of its three man board of directors not involved in its daily management. The appellees/ cross-appellants are Dunhall; Monte J. Staha and Jimmy Hatfield, Dunhall’s President and Sales Manager, respectively;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  3. Raines v. ToneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  4. Backus v. FinkelsteinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1927
  5. Lynch v. PattersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Long v. LamptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. CoughlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Seamans v. SeamansCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Crain v. CrainCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025
  5. Hall v. StahaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API