Legal Opinion

Ballard v. Murphy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 22, 1890No. 3567PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Kaufman County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Will-son, J.

§171. Witness fees; when suit for not maintainable; limitation of action for; amendment of pleading on appeal to county court. This action was instituted in justice’s court by appellee, Murphy, against appellant, as administratrix of the community estate of herself and her deceased husband, to recover the amount of certain witness fees accrued in a suit in which A. J. Ballard, the *242decedent, was plaintiff, and Erie Byrd was defendant, said fees aggregating $144.61. The suit, as originally instituted and prosecuted in the justice’s court, was upon an account embracing the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green v. RaymondTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Hollingsworth v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Thompson v. Branch's AdministratorsTexas Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Crawford v. CrainTexas Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wells v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Stark v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Stark v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API