Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Northern Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1979No. Nos. 12327, 12328Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWollman, Chief Justice

I agree with the majority opinion insofar as it affirms the trial court’s judgment that the matter must be remanded to the Public Utilities Commission for a redetermination of the service boundaries.

I do not agree, however, that the exclusive rights provision of SDCL 49-34A-42 must yield to the guidelines of SDCL 49-34A-44. The issue was not raised in the assignment of errors nor was it discussed in appellants’ brief.

The application of the equidistant concept set forth in SDCL 49-34A-43 is made subject to the explicit exception set forth in SDCL 49-34A-44. I see no such specific exception…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Willrodt v. Northwestern Public Service Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API