Legal Opinion
United States v. Shalynda Harris
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 30, 1999No. 99-1994PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Shalynda Harris appeals her conviction for bank robbery following a jury trial. Harris challenges the district court’s decision permitting the government to exercise a peremptory strike against a disabled juror claiming that this procedure violated her due process rights under the Fifth Amendment. For the reasons stated herein, we conclude that Harris’ constitutional rights were not violated, and we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
On September 15, 1998, an indictment was returned against Shalynda Harris for one count of armed robbery of a credit union in violation of 18 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Hummel v. St. Joseph County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Melinda Erickson, United States of America, Intervenor v. Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities for Northeastern Illinois UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Hershel R. Stanley v. Jon E. Litscher, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Sallie v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- United States v. Virgil E. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.