Strupp v. Canniff
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
This is an action to recover rent in which the defense is constructive eviction.
The matter was heard by the court without a jury and judgment entered for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for amended findings or a new trial.
During the period in question the premises were occupied by defendant under an oral month-to-month lease and were used by him to store and repair heavy equipment. Plaintiff acquired title in September 1962. On September 18, 1962, he gave defendant written notice that the lease would be terminated on November 1, 1962, unless the defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Radke v. BrenonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Leuthold v. StickneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Roach v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Leifman v. PercanskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Weiss v. Zenith Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fritz v. WarthenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Denney v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Abelmann v. SmartLease USA, LLCDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2020