Estell v. Barringer
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court 1
3 Ill. App.3d 455 (1972)
278 N.E.2d 424
CLARENCE ESTELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FLOYD S. BARRINGER, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11220.
Illinois Appellate Court Fourth District.
February 1, 1972.
Rehearing denied March 2, 1972.
McGrady, Madden & Watson, of Gillespie, (D.A. McGrady, of counsel,) for appellant.
Horsley, Kimble, Lott and Surman, of Springfield, for appellee.
Judgment affirmed.
2Opinion of the Court · MillsJustice Mills
This is a medical malpractice case in which the theory of the plaintiff-appellant is apparently: "The law ought to be * * *."
But in Illinois, it isn't.
As originally filed, the case was constructed on three footings …
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Metz v. Central Illinois Electric & Gas Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Bollenbach v. BloomenthalIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
- Scardina v. CollettiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Cobb v. Marshall Field & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.