Legal Opinion

Estell v. Barringer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 1, 1972No. 11220Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

3 Ill. App.3d 455 (1972)

278 N.E.2d 424

CLARENCE ESTELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FLOYD S. BARRINGER, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11220.

Illinois Appellate Court — Fourth District.

February 1, 1972.

Rehearing denied March 2, 1972.

McGrady, Madden & Watson, of Gillespie, (D.A. McGrady, of counsel,) for appellant.

Horsley, Kimble, Lott and Surman, of Springfield, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

2Opinion of the Court · MillsJustice Mills

This is a medical malpractice case in which the theory of the plaintiff-appellant is apparently: "The law ought to be * * *."

But — in Illinois, it isn't.

As originally filed, the case was constructed on three footings —…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Metz v. Central Illinois Electric & Gas Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Bollenbach v. BloomenthalIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Scardina v. CollettiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  5. Cobb v. Marshall Field & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API