Legal Opinion

Markus v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 1997No. 95-91115; CA A94933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPH, S. J.

Plaintiffs brought this contract action against defendants. The dispute went to mandatory arbitration, in which plaintiffs prevailed. Defendants then filed a notice of appeal and a request for trial de novo pursuant to ORS 36.425(2)(a). In the trial without a jury, defendants did not challenge the sufficiency of plaintiffs’ complaint, made no objections to any evidence and did not move for dismissal pursuant to ORCP 54 B(2) at the close of plaintiffs’ case in chief.1 The court found for plaintiffs and gave them a judgment in the amount awarded by the arbitrator and a supplemental…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Falk v. AmsberryOregon Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DeMarcoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Halone's Auto Repair v. B & R Auto WreckingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Markus v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Friedman v. ChristyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API