Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Michael Dreyer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 4, 2015No. 13-30077Published

1Concurrence

BERZON, Circuit Judge, joined by REINHARDT, Circuit Judge,

concurring:

I join fully in the majority opinion. I write separately to explain why I am comfortable with the holding that suppression is not warranted, although the panel opinion I authored held otherwise. See United States v. Dreyer, 767 F.3d 826, 835-37 (9th Cir.2014).

As a preliminary matter, when the case was before our three-judge panel, • the United States never contested that the exclusionary rule could apply to widespread and repeated violations of the PCA. The United States did not make this argument for good reason. Roberts…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Tyronski JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Michael A. WolffsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Ruby Davidson Walden and William Luther WaldenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  4. Larry Charbert Hayes v. Warden Hawes and Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General for the State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Bissonette v. HaigCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API