Legal Opinion

Baer v. Baer

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 1, 1993No. S93A1087PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunstein, Justice.

We granted discretionary review in this domestic relations case to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion by setting off certain claims by the husband against the wife’s claim for alimony and child support arrearages. As the issues of counterclaim and set-off were the sole issues raised on appeal other issues ruled on by the trial court are not before us and are therefore not affected by this decision.

Robert and Elizabeth Baer were divorced on February 27, 1992. In the divorce agreement, appellee-husband was ordered to pay alimony, child support, and other…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daniel v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. McNeal v. McNealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  4. Farmer v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. Attaway v. AttawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fuller v. FullerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  2. Brown v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. Sherman v. Proyect (In re Proyect)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
  4. Hopkinson v. HopkinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. T.M. v. L.H.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API