Dalack v. VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MIDDLEBROOKS, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Plaintiff Basil E. Dalack’s Motion for Final Summary Judgment [DE # 13]. The Defendant, Village of Tequesta (“the Village”), filed a response [DE # 18] and requested consideration of its response as a cross-motion for summary judgment. After review of the parties’ written submissions and oral argument, I find that the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment should be denied and the Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment should be granted.
I. Facts
The relevant facts are…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dalack v. Village of TequestaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007