Lambert v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
The Defendant-Below/Appellant, Bradford P. Lambert, III (“Lambert”) appeals from a final judgment of the Superior Court. Following a jury trial, Lambert was found guilty of Driving a Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (“DUI”). 1 Lambert raises one claim in this direct appeal. Lambert contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress blood alcohol concentration (“BAC”) evidence because ■ the Search Warrant Affidavit (“Affidavit”) failed to set forth facts sufficient to show probable cause. We have concluded that Lambert’s claim is without…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Locke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Sisson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- State v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Bease v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Jarvis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bowie v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2023
- Scarborough v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- State of Delaware v. Dartanya MurrayDelaware Court of Common Pleas · 2017
- State of Delaware v. Hackendorn.Superior Court of Delaware · 2016
- State v. LawSuperior Court of Delaware · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.