Legal Opinion

Lambert v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 12, 2015No. 318, 2014PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

The Defendant-Below/Appellant, Bradford P. Lambert, III (“Lambert”) appeals from a final judgment of the Superior Court. Following a jury trial, Lambert was found guilty of Driving a Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol (“DUI”). 1 Lambert raises one claim in this direct appeal. Lambert contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress blood alcohol concentration (“BAC”) evidence because ■ the Search Warrant Affidavit (“Affidavit”) failed to set forth facts sufficient to show probable cause. We have concluded that Lambert’s claim is without…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Locke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  2. Sisson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  3. State v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Bease v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  5. Jarvis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bowie v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2023
  2. Scarborough v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  3. State of Delaware v. Dartanya MurrayDelaware Court of Common Pleas · 2017
  4. State of Delaware v. Hackendorn.Superior Court of Delaware · 2016
  5. State v. LawSuperior Court of Delaware · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API