Legal Opinion

Duey v. Clemens

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1845PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Error. Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin county. Simon Duey, Administrator of Jacob Stoner, deceased, plaintiff in error, and plaintiff below, against Jacob Clemens.

Read the full summary

In Error. Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin county. Simon Duey, Administrator of Jacob Stoner, deceased, plaintiff in error, and plaintiff below, against Jacob Clemens. It appeared from the record returned, that this was a case stated in the nature of a special verdict, for the opinion of the court, subject to a writ of error by either party, upon the following statement of facts:: John Stoner, of Dauphin county, died in the year 1815, leaving a widow and four children and real estate in the said county. That proceedings in partition were had in the Orphans’ Court of Dauphin…

1Per curiam

We affirm this judgment for the reasons given by the judge, who ruled the point below.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hollenberger v. Yaukey, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1891
  2. Fenton v. FentonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API