Rich v. Piland
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Judge.
In this pro se appeal to which the appellee has not responded, the defendant-appellant protests a judgment finding him indebted to the plaintiff on open account in the amount of $427.13. While certain "charges” of the trial court are enumerated as error, these appear instead to be the court’s findings of fact included in the order since the judgment was entered after a trial before the court without the intervention of a jury. The brief refers to the *254testimony of witnesses but there is no transcript of any hearing. "Without the transcript we can not know what transpired.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Milam v. MilamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown v. Capitol Fish Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981