Legal Opinion

People v. Cummins

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1882PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Exceptions from Recorder’s Court of Detroit. Information for larceny. Respondent was convicted below.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Cummins was convicted in the Recorder’s Court of Detroit on a charge of larceny from the person and he comes here for a review on exceptions. He was charged jointly with Murphy, but on the election of the prosecuting attorney a separate trial was ordered by the court. The jurors were however put upon their oaths before the order for separate trial was formally entered in the record and this is made a ground of exception. The point is devoid of merit and it is needless to multiply reasons in refutation. The swearing of the jury and the actual entry of the order occurred at the same stage and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hubbardston Lumber Co. v. CovertMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Rash v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Ashton v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Garner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  4. People v. FarrarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. People v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API