Legal Opinion
Alexander v. Succession of Alexander
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1969No. 2931PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
En Banc.
2Per curiam
This matter is before the Court on motion by defendant-appellee to dismiss an unlodged appeal.
Counsel for appellee advances three reasons for dismissing the appeal:(1) That Eunice Alexander has without excuse failed and refused to timely pay, in accordance with Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure, Article 2126, the costs of preparing the transcript of evidence taken on the trial in the district court, and the fees for filing the appeal in this Court;(2), That the return date of the appeal or the extensions thereon have elapsed, and in accordance with LSA-C.C.P.…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Solomon v. HickmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- McMillen Feeder Finance Corporation v. ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Mathies v. Fruehauf Trailer Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Atlantic Gulf Supply Corp. v. McDonaldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Johnson v. PatoutLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of Taylor v. HarveyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976