Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1906No. Docket No. 115PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Montcalm; Dodds, J., presiding. Summary proceedings by Mary A. Smith against C. Newton Smith and Charles N. Smith for the possession of certain real estate. There was judgment for complainant, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

An action was begun by complainant against defendants, under the statute providing for summary proceedings to obtain possession of lands, before a circuit court commissioner of Montcalm county, wherein defendants were charged with unlawfully holding over said premises after the time for which they were demised or let to them. Defendants pleaded the general issue. The case was tried before the commissioner and complainant appealed to the circuit court. It was heard before the court without a jury, Hon. Peter E. Dodds, circuit judge of the twenty-first circuit, presiding. Upon the facts and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kokalis v. WhitehurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Mikesell v. WadeMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Skeels v. SnowMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API