Sanders v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Hall, J. cited: State v. Sin-not, 15 Neb., 476; 77. 8. v. Bough, 6 McLean [U. S.], 476; Colburn v. Sweet, 1 Met. [Mass.], 232; Brown v. Barry, 3 Dali. [U. S.], 365; State v. Berlin, 21 S. Car., 292; Marmet v. State, 45 O. St., 63; State v. Cordon, 60 Mo., 383; Foxworthy v. Hastings, 23 Neb., 772; Roger v. People, 9 Colo., 450; Huffsmith v. People, 8 Id., 175; Hetzer v. People, 4 Id., 45; Heinssen v. State,…
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Hall, J. cited: State v. Sin-not, 15 Neb., 476; 77. 8. v. Bough, 6 McLean [U. S.], 476; Colburn v. Sweet, 1 Met. [Mass.], 232; Brown v. Barry, 3 Dali. [U. S.], 365; State v. Berlin, 21 S. Car., 292; Marmet v. State, 45 O. St., 63; State v. Cordon, 60 Mo., 383; Foxworthy v. Hastings, 23 Neb., 772; Roger v. People, 9 Colo., 450; Huffsmith v. People, 8 Id., 175; Hetzer v. People, 4 Id., 45; Heinssen v. State, 14 Id., 228. cited: State v. Sinnot, 15 Neb., 472; Heinssen v. State, 14 Colo., 228.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
A complaint was filed before a justice of the peace of the city of Lincoln, charging plaintiff in error with selling intoxicating liquors within the limits of said city on the 23d day of September, 1891, the day on which a special election was held in said city. He was arrested, tried, and convicted, and sentenced by the justice to pay a fine of $100 and the costs of prosecution. A petition in error was prosecuted to the district court and the judgment of the justice of the peace was affirmed.
There is no controversy upon the facts. Plaintiff on September 23, 1891, was a licensed saloon keeper…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gardner v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
- Heinssen v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- State v. SinnottNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. DudgeonNebraska Supreme Court · 1909