Legal Opinion
10X Genomics, Inc. v. Brucker Spatial Biology Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 28, 2023No. 1:21-cv-00653Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE 10X GENOMICS, INC. and ) PROGNOSYS BIOSCIENCES, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. 21-cv-653-MFK ) NANOSTRING ) TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: 10x Genomics, Inc. and Prognosys Biosciences, Inc. (collectively 10x) have sued NanoString Technologies, Inc. for infringement of eight patents: United States Patent Nos. 10,472,669 (the '669 patent); 10,662,467 (the '467 patent); 10,961,566 (the '566 patent); 10,983,113 (the '113 patent); 10,996,219…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.