Seidenstriker v. Buffum
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to the Common Pleas of Allegheny county. Buffum & Co., in May, 1849, brought suit against Hutchison before an alderman, from whose judgment defendant appealed to the Common Pleas, and plaintiff again procured a judgment on award of arbitrators. Plaintiff issued a scire facias against Seidenstriker, who was bail for Hutchison before the alderman.
Read the full summary
Error to the Common Pleas of Allegheny county. Buffum & Co., in May, 1849, brought suit against Hutchison before an alderman, from whose judgment defendant appealed to the Common Pleas, and plaintiff again procured a judgment on award of arbitrators. Plaintiff issued a scire facias against Seidenstriker, who was bail for Hutchison before the alderman. Defendant plead nul tiel record. ' May 19,1850, after argument, judgment ■for plaintiff for twenty dollars, the penalty, to be released on payment of costs. The proceedings, in part, were to the following effect: June 1, plaintiff appears and…
1Opinion of the Court
— Per Curiam.
— This recognizance is within the rule of the conservative decisions. It is a note of the substance, from which a formal recognizance may be made up, and supports the plaintiff’s part of the issue, taken on the plea of nul tiel record.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Winchester v. RichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Commonwealth v. GouldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912