Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Easley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1917No. 8550, 8581PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari; from Catoosa superior court—Judge Tarver. February 7, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.

C. L. Easley, the defendant in error in the main bill of exceptions, was declared elected tax-collector of Catoosa county by a majority of 96 on the face of the returns. A. B. Robertson, plaintiff in error in the main bill of exceptions, contested the election on the grounds, that he received a majority of the legal votes cast in the election; that a number of votes cast for *259Easley were illegal, because of nonpayment of taxes, and for various other reasons; that a large number of persons who voted for Easley were not legally registered; that is, their names did not appear upon the permanent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carter v. JanesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Harris v. GlennSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Johnson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Simpson v. RimesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Farkas v. City of AlbanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Owen v. ButlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Griffin v. TrappSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  3. West v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Nichols v. FairclothCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Griffin v. TrappSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API