Legal Opinion

Faherty v. Gracias

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 2005PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, J.:

¶ 1 In this medical malpractice case, plaintiffs sued Dr. Vicente Gracias and the trauma nurses of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. According to plaintiffs, a retained laparotomy sponge caused Michael Faherty to suffer a bacterial infection which then led to Mr. Faherty’s sepsis, multiple organ failure, and subsequently, his death. A jury, however, found that neither the nurses nor Dr. Gra-cias was negligent. Mr. Faherty’s wife has now appealed and raises (in all) twenty-two claims of error. We do not believe that any of appellant’s claims have merit and must…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Jones v. Montefiore HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Birth Center v. St. Paul Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Atkins v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Thomas Jefferson University v. WapnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Keffer v. Bob Nolan's Auto Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Jones, H., Aplt. v. Ott, R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Geise v. Nationwide Life & Annuity Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Webb v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API