Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Franklin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 13, 1995No. 24190Published

1Dissent

Finney, Justice:

I respectfully dissent. In my opinion, the trial court’s mishandling of the Batson issue, and the admission of photographs 40 and 90 in the sentencing phase require reversal.

After a jury was selected, each party made a Batson motion. A hearing was held, and the trial judge found both appellant and the State had exercised unconstitutional peremptory strikes. The names of all jurors called in the first selection proceeding were put back in the pool, and a new jury selection proceeding commenced. One of the individuals improperly stricken by appellant was juror Cantley. Juror…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. GrandySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  5. National Health Corp. v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API