Legal Opinion

Kennecott Copper Corp. v. State Tax Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1972No. 12498Published

1DissentCallister, Chief Justice

(dissenting) :

I respectfully dissent. The justification for the Commission to depart from the statutory formula was premised primarily on the alleged distortion caused by the sales factor, which by legislative determination did not attribute to this jurisdiction any sale of tangible personal property shipped or delivered to a purchaser out of state, 59-13-92, 93, U.C.A.1953, as amended 1967. The Commission thus proceeded to repeal or amend the entire statutory scheme under the relief provisions of 59-*12613-95 on the ground that the apportionment provisions did not “fairly represent the extent of…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Western Contracting Corp. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Kennecott Copper Corp. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API