Kennecott Copper Corp. v. State Tax Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentCallister, Chief Justice
(dissenting) :
I respectfully dissent. The justification for the Commission to depart from the statutory formula was premised primarily on the alleged distortion caused by the sales factor, which by legislative determination did not attribute to this jurisdiction any sale of tangible personal property shipped or delivered to a purchaser out of state, 59-13-92, 93, U.C.A.1953, as amended 1967. The Commission thus proceeded to repeal or amend the entire statutory scheme under the relief provisions of 59-*12613-95 on the ground that the apportionment provisions did not “fairly represent the extent of…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Western Contracting Corp. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1966
- Kennecott Copper Corp. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1956