Legal Opinion

Quillian v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 8, 1924No. 15683PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBlood wobth, J.

1. The 3d ground of the motion for a new trial is not complete within itself, and therefore, cannot be considered by this court. It fails to show that the evidence of defendant’s witness, which was excluded, was material, or that its exclusion was harmful to the accused, or that the State’s witness sought to be impeached by the excluded testimony was a material witness, or that his evidence was harmful to the accused. To ascertain these facts reference to other portions of the record would be necessary. Cason v. Dickson, 30 Ga. App. 336 (118 S. E. 72); Sherman v. Stephens, 30 Ga. App. 509…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sherman v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Cason v. DicksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Quinn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API