Legal Opinion

Amadu Bah v. John Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 9, 2003No. 02-61129PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Per curiam

Amadu Bah (“Bah”) seeks review of a final order issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal of two adverse decisions of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”). The IJ determined that Bah was ineligible for withholding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U-S.C.A. §§ 1101-1537 (West 1999), because he participated in the persecution of others based on their political opinion. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1231(b)(3), INA § 241(b)(3). The IJ further determined that Bah failed to produce objective evidence he would likely be subjected to torture if returned to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boleslavs Maikovskis v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. Ruiz-Romero v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Roy v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Tamara-Gomez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  3. Roberto Ferrer Miranda Alvarado Madeleine Janet Morales Lopez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Juan Larin-Ulloa v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  5. Luis A. Higuit v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API