Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. Paine & Nixon Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 26, 1930No. 28,095PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 234 N.W. 453. Plaintiff sued to recover $3,676.44. The answer admitted plaintiff's cause of action but pleaded a counterclaim, which the jury allowed in the sum of $775 and deducted that amount in fixing the verdict for plaintiff.
Defendant appealed from a judgment entered pursuant to an order granting plaintiff's motion for judgment non obstante for the full amount of plaintiff's claim or a new trial.
We are concerned with the counterclaim only. It rests in an oral contract which plaintiff says is illegal because it is in restraint of trade in violation of G. S. 1923 (2 Mason,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Christgau v. Woodlawn Cemetery Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Porous Media Corporation v. Midland Brake, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Lien v. Northwestern Engineering Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
- Western Oil & Fuel Co. v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- Noreen v. Park Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.