MATTER OF LINFIELD v. Nyquist
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Petitioner’s sole contention on this appeal is that the pen*1007alty of dismissal from her position as a tenured high school teacher is excessive. However, in light of the affirmed findings of incompetent and inefficient service in this case, we cannot say, as a matter of law, that the sanction of dismissal was inappropriate. (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222.)
We recognize that, in consequence of the by-law provision cited by the dissenter, the action of the board of education will work a…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. Board of Education of Mamaroneck Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Jones v. HudacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Wohlleb v. Board of Education of Bridgehampton Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Roach v. Plainedge Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Faville v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.