Legal Opinion

Branch v. Cardillo

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 27, 2011No. C.A. No. PC 07-620Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

After a non-jury trial, Plaintiffs were awarded recovery, under a theory of unjust enrichment, of the contributions that they had made toward the settlement of a mortgage on property that now is owned by Defendant, Thomas C. Cardillo, Jr. (Defendant). See Decision of the Court, dated February 24, 2011. The issue now before the Court is whether, pursuant to G.L. 1956 § 9-21-10, Plaintiffs are entitled to prejudgment interest on that award.

Following this Court's written Decision in the above-captioned matter, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Entry of Judgment with Interest, pursuant to §…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Paula H. Roy v. Star Chopper Company, Inc., and Third-Party v. Ashok Hingorany and Advanced Materials Systems, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  2. United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Joseph P. Balistrieri and Angelina J. Hurdelbrink, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Julia Rogers v. Leroy LoetherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  4. Dobrowolska Ex Rel. Dobrowolska v. WallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. DiMeo v. PhilbinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API