Legal Opinion
People v. Worley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 16, 2008PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*754The New York Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (hereinafter the Board) completed a risk assessment instrument to determine the defendant’s sex offender status for purposes of the Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA). The defendant was assessed a total of 75 points, making him a presumptive level two sex offender. However, the Board recommended an upward departure to a level three designation. After a hearing, the Supreme Court designated the defendant a level three sex offender. We affirm.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention on appeal, children depicted in pornographic images…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. LawlessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. FiolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. VillaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. ManougianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. GabrielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. DeWoodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. HardingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. PerahiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.