Legal Opinion

Prysok v. National Park Service

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided January 8, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00015Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER PRYSOK, Case No. 2:24-cv-15 Plaintiff, Hon. Jane M. Beckering U.S. District Judge v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, Defendant. __________________________________/ REPORT & RECOMMENDATION I. Introduction Plaintiff Christopher Prysok, representing himself, filed his unverified complaint on January 29, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) The National Park Service (“NPS”) is the only Defendant. Plaintiff alleges in general terms that the NPS violated his rights by terminating a Commercial Use Authorization (CUA) he obtained on behalf…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  4. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Rmi Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API