Legal Opinion

Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Enright

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 29, 1906No. Gen. No. 12,809PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action in case for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Chaeles A. Bishop, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1905.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Brown

delivered the opinion of the court.

Contentions ■ of the defendant which lie at the foundation of its complaint against this judgment are, that the declaration neither before nor after its amendment on December 30, 1904, stated a good cause of action, and that even if it did after said amendment sufficiently state a cause of action to sustain a judgment, this was the result of that amendment, made more than two years after the accident. For these reasons, it is insisted that the trial court erred in refusing to arrest judgment after verdict, and that at all events it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. HansenIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Chicago City Railway Co. v. FennimoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. JohnsenIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Wabash Railway Co. v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. John Spry Lumber Co. v. DugganIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Foreman Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1929
  2. Zyla v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API