Roan v. Union Central Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Gilbert, Justice.
1. “A married, woman may borrow money for tlie purpose of paying debts of her husband, and give her note and mortgage therefor; and such a contract will be binding upon her, although the lender may know, at the time the loan is made, that she is borrowing it for this purpose, if he is not the husband’s creditor who is to be thus paid, and is no party to any arrangement or scheme between the husband and wife of which the borrowing of the money by her for such purpose is the outcome.” Braswell v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia, 165 Ga. 123 (3) (139 S. E. 861), and cit.; Saxon v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Braswell v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Saxon v. National City BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
3Cited by6 opinions
- Monk v. HoldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Johnston v. SusmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Purdue v. BarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Wilson v. CummingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Keuffel & Esser v. International Ass'n of MachinistsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.