Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Sim v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1932No. 23786Published

1DissentMillard, J.

(dissenting)- — -I grant, solus arguendo, that the power to appoint receivers is inherent in courts of equity, and that the legislature can not divest the courts of that prerogative. However, equity courts at the common law, and at the time of the adoption of our state constitution, did not have, and at the' present time in the absence of statutory authority therefor, they do not have, the power to authorize and direct chancery receivers to borrow money for any purposes other than that of preservation of the property of the insolvent or the continuance of the insolvent’s business. In the case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Craver v. GreerTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Lockport Felt Co. v. United Box Board & Paper Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
  3. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co. v. S. H. Greene & Sons Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API