James v. Naumann
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Our examination of the record in this matter reveals the following language within the Sales Agreement, not brought to our attention by the parties, which we deem conclusive of the claim that the defendants/appellees fraudulently represented that the real property in question would produce a substantial yield and increase in value in future years:
17. It is agreed that through the instrumentality of Naumann & Associates, Inc., the Purchaser became interested in said property but that Purchaser’s decision to buy was based on his inspection and investigation of the property and not on any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Besett v. BasnettSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Mankap Enterprises, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Alarm ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Foxfire Inn of Stuart, Florida, Inc. v. NeffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
3Cited by1 opinion
- Leviton v. Philly Steak-Out, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988