Legal Opinion

State v. Browning

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 30, 1921No. 10629PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before Ríos, J., Orangeburg, September term;, 1919, and Mauldin, J., Orangeburg, September term;, 1920. James P. Browning was indicted for the murder of Baurie P. Fairey, and upon conviction appeals. Subsequently a motion for a new trial was made before Judge T. J. Mauldin and a new trial ordered.

Read the full summary

Before Ríos, J., Orangeburg, September term;, 1919, and Mauldin, J., Orangeburg, September term;, 1920. James P. Browning was indicted for the murder of Baurie P. Fairey, and upon conviction appeals. Subsequently a motion for a new trial was made before Judge T. J. Mauldin and a new trial ordered. From this order the State appeals.- The order granting new trial, directed to be reported, follows : This is a mlotion for a new trial, the defendant having been convicted of murder, with a recommendation to mercy, at the September, 1919, term of the Court of General Sessions in and- for the county…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

The respondent was convicted of murder with a recommendation to mercy before Judge Rice and a jury at the September term of Could, 1919, for Orangeburg County, and sentenced by the Judge to life imprisonment. From this judgment and sentence defendant appealed.

Rater, to wit, September, 1920, a m'otion whs made in the Court of General Sessions before Judge Mauldin, for a new trial, which was granted. Thereupon the State appealed and challenges the correctness of this order granting a new1 trial. This order should be set out in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HiltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  2. State v. Tidwell.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. King v. HollidaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API