Legal Opinion

Muench v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1973No. State 98PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The defendant raises several issues. The first one is that he should be granted a new trial in the interest of justice.

His principal arguments as to this issue are that trial counsel did not request a formal determination of competency to stand trial and that counsel did not advise the defendant to enter a plea of not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect.

Upon motion made in the county court, the defendant was committed to Central State for a physical and mental examination to determine his competency to stand trial. A summary of this examination is as follows:

“The above-named was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HebardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Schwamb v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Day v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rosado v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Jeffrey Ames Hughes v. James Mathews, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  3. Robert Muench v. Thomas Israel and Attorney General of Wisconsin, Richard Worthing v. Thomas R. IsraelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Schimmel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hughes v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API