Muench v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The defendant raises several issues. The first one is that he should be granted a new trial in the interest of justice.
His principal arguments as to this issue are that trial counsel did not request a formal determination of competency to stand trial and that counsel did not advise the defendant to enter a plea of not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect.
Upon motion made in the county court, the defendant was committed to Central State for a physical and mental examination to determine his competency to stand trial. A summary of this examination is as follows:
“The above-named was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HebardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Schwamb v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Day v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rosado v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Jeffrey Ames Hughes v. James Mathews, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Robert Muench v. Thomas Israel and Attorney General of Wisconsin, Richard Worthing v. Thomas R. IsraelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Schimmel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Hughes v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.